MCPizy
BrowseGuidesDocsFor publishersSubmit
Scraping & Search

Firecrawl vs ScrapingBee: Which MCP should you use?

🔥

Firecrawl

LLM-ready web scraping API

VS
🐝

ScrapingBee

Headless browser scraping API

TL;DR

Firecrawl is scraping optimized for LLMs — it returns clean Markdown/JSON and has a /crawl endpoint that walks a site. ScrapingBee is a general-purpose headless-browser scraping API that returns raw HTML. Firecrawl wins for RAG pipelines; ScrapingBee wins when you want to parse HTML yourself with flexibility.

Firecrawl: 2 winsScrapingBee: 3 wins3 ties
🔥

Pick Firecrawl

Pick Firecrawl when your end use is LLM (RAG, summarization, extract).

🐝

Pick ScrapingBee

Pick ScrapingBee when you want raw HTML and your own parsing (Cheerio, BeautifulSoup).

Feature-by-feature comparison

Output

Tie

Firecrawl

Markdown + LLM-ready JSON

ScrapingBee

Raw HTML + screenshots

Crawl whole site

A

Firecrawl

Native /crawl

ScrapingBee

Not built-in

JS rendering

Tie

Firecrawl

Default

ScrapingBee

Default

Extract API (LLM-guided)

A

Firecrawl

Yes (extract)

ScrapingBee

Limited

Proxy types

B

Firecrawl

Rotating pool

ScrapingBee

Datacenter + residential

Screenshot API

Tie

Firecrawl

Yes

ScrapingBee

Yes

Google search API

B

Firecrawl

No (use Tavily)

ScrapingBee

Google search add-on

Price per 1000 req

B

Firecrawl

~$2-5

ScrapingBee

~$1-3

🔥

Best for

Firecrawl

  • Crawl whole site: Native /crawl
  • Extract API (LLM-guided): Yes (extract)
🐝

Best for

ScrapingBee

  • Proxy types: Datacenter + residential
  • Google search API: Google search add-on
  • Price per 1000 req: ~$1-3

Migration path

Both are simple REST APIs. ScrapingBee → Firecrawl: replace the /api/v1/?url=... call with firecrawl.scrape_url(), drop your own HTML parser in favor of Firecrawl's extract schema. Firecrawl → ScrapingBee: add a parser (Cheerio/BS4) on the HTML, reimplement crawl-depth logic yourself with a queue.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Firecrawl and ScrapingBee?

Firecrawl is scraping optimized for LLMs — it returns clean Markdown/JSON and has a /crawl endpoint that walks a site. ScrapingBee is a general-purpose headless-browser scraping API that returns raw HTML. Firecrawl wins for RAG pipelines; ScrapingBee wins when you want to parse HTML yourself with flexibility. In short: Firecrawl — LLM-ready web scraping API. ScrapingBee — Headless browser scraping API.

When should I pick Firecrawl over ScrapingBee?

Pick Firecrawl when your end use is LLM (RAG, summarization, extract).

When should I pick ScrapingBee over Firecrawl?

Pick ScrapingBee when you want raw HTML and your own parsing (Cheerio, BeautifulSoup).

Can I migrate from one to the other?

Both are simple REST APIs. ScrapingBee → Firecrawl: replace the /api/v1/?url=... call with firecrawl.scrape_url(), drop your own HTML parser in favor of Firecrawl's extract schema. Firecrawl → ScrapingBee: add a parser (Cheerio/BS4) on the HTML, reimplement crawl-depth logic yourself with a queue.

Do Firecrawl and ScrapingBee both work with MCP-compatible AI agents?

Firecrawl has an MCP server installable via MCPizy (mcpizy install firecrawl). ScrapingBee is not yet in the MCPizy directory — check its vendor's own docs for an MCP server.

Install Firecrawl with MCPizy

ScrapingBee isn't in the MCPizy directory yet — install Firecrawl and compare it against ScrapingBee manually.

$mcpizy install firecrawl
Free to install.