Backend Platforms

Supabase vs PlanetScale: Which MCP should you use?

🟢

Supabase

Open-source Firebase alternative on Postgres

VS
🪐

PlanetScale

Serverless MySQL platform with branching

TL;DR

Supabase is a Postgres-based BaaS with auth, storage, and realtime. PlanetScale is serverless MySQL (Vitess) with branching, schema workflows, and massive horizontal scale. Supabase gives you a full backend; PlanetScale gives you a bulletproof MySQL database.

Supabase: 4 winsPlanetScale: 3 wins1 tie
🟢

Pick Supabase

Pick Supabase when you need a full backend (DB + auth + storage + realtime + functions).

🪐

Pick PlanetScale

Pick PlanetScale when you want serverless MySQL with branching, zero downtime, and Vitess scale.

Feature-by-feature comparison

Database engine

Tie

Supabase

Postgres

PlanetScale

MySQL (Vitess)

Branching / schema workflow

B

Supabase

Branching + migrations

PlanetScale

Industry-leading branching

Auth built-in

A

Supabase

Yes

PlanetScale

No

Storage built-in

A

Supabase

Yes

PlanetScale

No

Realtime subs

A

Supabase

Yes

PlanetScale

No

Horizontal scaling

B

Supabase

Read replicas

PlanetScale

Vitess shards (massive)

Schema deploy safety

B

Supabase

Standard migrations

PlanetScale

Deploy Requests, zero-dt

Open source core

A

Supabase

Yes

PlanetScale

Vitess yes, platform no

🟢

Best for

Supabase

  • Auth built-in: Yes
  • Storage built-in: Yes
  • Realtime subs: Yes
  • Open source core: Yes
🪐

Best for

PlanetScale

  • Branching / schema workflow: Industry-leading branching
  • Horizontal scaling: Vitess shards (massive)
  • Schema deploy safety: Deploy Requests, zero-dt

Migration path

Different engines: you're migrating MySQL↔Postgres at the same time. Use pgloader (MySQL→PG) or a CDC tool like Debezium for low-downtime moves. Re-implement auth via Supabase Auth or bring your own (Clerk/Auth.js + PlanetScale). Realtime has no PlanetScale equivalent — rebuild on Pusher, Ably, or keep Supabase for that subset.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Supabase and PlanetScale?

Supabase is a Postgres-based BaaS with auth, storage, and realtime. PlanetScale is serverless MySQL (Vitess) with branching, schema workflows, and massive horizontal scale. Supabase gives you a full backend; PlanetScale gives you a bulletproof MySQL database. In short: Supabase — Open-source Firebase alternative on Postgres. PlanetScale — Serverless MySQL platform with branching.

When should I pick Supabase over PlanetScale?

Pick Supabase when you need a full backend (DB + auth + storage + realtime + functions).

When should I pick PlanetScale over Supabase?

Pick PlanetScale when you want serverless MySQL with branching, zero downtime, and Vitess scale.

Can I migrate from one to the other?

Different engines: you're migrating MySQL↔Postgres at the same time. Use pgloader (MySQL→PG) or a CDC tool like Debezium for low-downtime moves. Re-implement auth via Supabase Auth or bring your own (Clerk/Auth.js + PlanetScale). Realtime has no PlanetScale equivalent — rebuild on Pusher, Ably, or keep Supabase for that subset.

Do Supabase and PlanetScale both work with MCP-compatible AI agents?

Yes. Both have MCP servers installable via MCPizy (mcpizy install supabase and mcpizy install planetscale). They work identically across Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, and any other MCP-compatible client. You can install both side by side and route queries in your agent's prompt.

Install both with MCPizy

Not sure? Run both side by side — swap between them in your AI agent with a single config line.

$mcpizy install supabase && mcpizy install planetscale
Free to install. Swap between them in your agent config.